Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio

The purpose of this article was to compare the compressive strength of different glass ionomers. 30 samples were made, divided into groups of 10. Ketac Easy Mix, Vitremer and Ketac N 100, were used for the test. Cylinders were made of each material, following the manufacturer’s instructions for each...

Descripción completa

Autor Principal: Hernández Rivera, Alejandra
Formato: Artículo
Idioma: Español
Publicado: Universidad de Costa Rica 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea: http://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/14322
http://hdl.handle.net/10669/21372
id RepoKERWA21372
recordtype dspace
spelling RepoKERWA213722017-08-08T18:50:02Z Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio Hernández Rivera, Alejandra glass ionomer compressive strength The purpose of this article was to compare the compressive strength of different glass ionomers. 30 samples were made, divided into groups of 10. Ketac Easy Mix, Vitremer and Ketac N 100, were used for the test. Cylinders were made of each material, following the manufacturer’s instructions for each case, using molds Ultradent preformed for this purpose. The samples were stored in water at 37 ° C for 24 hrs, before being faulted in an Olsen testing machine Tiinus H 10 Ks at a speed of 0.1 cm / min. The Ketac Easy Mix had a compressive strength of 40.9 Mpa, the Vitremer had an average strength of 111.7 MPa, whereas for Ketac N 100 was 117.4 MPa. Hybrids glass ionomers have a higher compression resistance, far superior to conventional glass ionomer evaluated. The purpose of this article was to compare the compressive strength of different glass ionomers. 30 samples were made, divided into groups of 10. Ketac Easy Mix, Vitremer and Ketac N 100, were used for the test. Cylinders were made of each material, following the manufacturer’s instructions for each case, using molds Ultradent preformed for this purpose. The samples were stored in water at 37 ° C for 24 hrs, before being faulted in an Olsen testing machine Tiinus H 10 Ks at a speed of 0.1 cm / min. The Ketac Easy Mix had a compressive strength of 40.9 Mpa, the Vitremer had an average strength of 111.7 MPa, whereas for Ketac N 100 was 117.4 MPa. Hybrids glass ionomers have a higher compression resistance, far superior to conventional glass ionomer evaluated  2014-04-23 2016-05-02T22:19:10Z 2016-05-02T22:19:10Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/14322 http://hdl.handle.net/10669/21372 spa Copyright (c) 2014 Odovtos application/pdf Universidad de Costa Rica Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences; Οδοντος (Odontos): Número 14; 55-58 Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences; Οδοντος (Odontos): Número 14; 55-58 2215-3411 1659-1046 10.15517/ijds.v0i14
institution Universidad de Costa Rica
collection Repositorio KERWA
language Español
topic glass ionomer
compressive strength
spellingShingle glass ionomer
compressive strength
Hernández Rivera, Alejandra
Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio
description The purpose of this article was to compare the compressive strength of different glass ionomers. 30 samples were made, divided into groups of 10. Ketac Easy Mix, Vitremer and Ketac N 100, were used for the test. Cylinders were made of each material, following the manufacturer’s instructions for each case, using molds Ultradent preformed for this purpose. The samples were stored in water at 37 ° C for 24 hrs, before being faulted in an Olsen testing machine Tiinus H 10 Ks at a speed of 0.1 cm / min. The Ketac Easy Mix had a compressive strength of 40.9 Mpa, the Vitremer had an average strength of 111.7 MPa, whereas for Ketac N 100 was 117.4 MPa. Hybrids glass ionomers have a higher compression resistance, far superior to conventional glass ionomer evaluated.
format Artículo
author Hernández Rivera, Alejandra
author_sort Hernández Rivera, Alejandra
title Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio
title_short Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio
title_full Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio
title_fullStr Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio
title_full_unstemmed Comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio
title_sort comparación de la resistencia compresiva entre diferentes tipos de ionómeros de vidrio
publisher Universidad de Costa Rica
publishDate 2014
url http://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/article/view/14322
http://hdl.handle.net/10669/21372
_version_ 1605707547407286272
score 11.76378